#

redactedscience

(10 articles)

Clear Evidence, No Trial #1 - IBS and Antifungals

Despite evidence from a study 9 years ago, cited hundreds of times in literature, that antifungals can help IBS patients, no trial has ever been done. Why? Well, fluconazole costs pennies a day and the drugs they are selling to IBS patients cost up to 100x more.

nostribshealthwellnesspoliticsbig pharmaredactedscienceTheArchitect

They Looked. They were ALMOST right. They were Destroyed

[Boom. I'm back with more Redacted Science. This time I am going to show you the theory through a difference lens using the story of a man trying to save his schizophrenic son. He trains another doctor in his theories, and that guy goes on to kill ..well, too many people with unnecessary surgeries and complete removal of all teeth. Anyway, I actually found something in the father's data. It ties completely into Redacted Science theories and explains their data, our data, and more.

#nostrbitcoinredactedscienceHealth

Explaining Redacted Science to Mom

[Hello Reader - I'm here again, this time with another true story...a bit different this time, same subject, different audience and most of the complete picture. Please forward to anyone - that's the goal, spread the word that Science is no longer Redacted....time for people to get to work]

redactedscienceevolutioncandidaphilosophysciencenostr

The Three Books Behind the Counter

Orange-Pill design [While the science I share is true (and the theories remain theories), I've yet to get someone to engage. So, I have attempted to take a very impactful portion of my story and create an "Orange-pill" version of everything. This is the hook to try and get you, reader, to engage. Put me to the test, grill me, push me. Honest intellectual discussion only. I've got the receipts, let's go through it together. This is the brief version of the moments leading to when I found the (now) Redacted Science]

nostrredactedscienceevolutionnostrbitcoin

Redacted Science - The Broadening

[Hi again readers. You've got the spunky version of me again, at least for a bit. Redacted Science isn't an article, or a book, or a podcast, or an IPFS folder, it is a broadcast. Know an evolutionary biologist? Send this to them. Point them to me.] This article is a summarization of the last two months of a redacted medical condition which really wouldn't matter, except the science they redacted is evolutionary. So, yeah, maybe it's worth figuring out.

redactedscienceevolutionnostrsciencesuppression

Redacted Science: The Pan-Mammalian Co-Evolution Hypothesis

A Further Refinement of the Co-Evolution Framework This article represents a further refinement of the theoretical framework first presented in Redacted Science. It does not invalidate prior theory — it extends it. The Methylation/Neural Selection hypothesis and the Pan-Mammalian Co-Evolution hypothesis are complementary. They describe different layers of the same architecture.

redactedscienceevolutionbiohackingnostr

To Those That Didn't Do the Reading

A recent post sharing the Pan-Mammalian Co-Evolution Hypothesis was removed from r/evolution and r/speculativeevolution. Rather than let the moderators' justifications stand unanswered, I walked through each one — AI psychosis, AI slop, pseudoscience, drug abuse, misrepresentation of epigenetics, IP concerns, convincing yourself of a made-up illness — with the calm precision of someone who has been documenting this for thirty years, speaks with complete honesty and openness, and built a distributed archive across Nostr, IPFS, YouTube, Odysee, Substack, Medium, Spotify, hashtree, and redactedchat.com specifically because he knew this day would come.

redactedsciencenostrredditsuppressionbitcoinscience

They Didn’t Delete It. They Just Removed it from the Indexes.

Hey reader! So today I did a thing. I added clickable “starter questions” to Redacted Chat so people don’t have to guess where to begin. This one is one of my favorites: How does control over what gets indexed or remembered shape medicine, science, and the future itself? And then… the system answered. Not with generic AI fluff, but by pulling straight from Redacted Science and laying out the core thesis cleanly and coherently — the whole chain: indexing → memory → narrative → intent → future. The funny (and validating) part? The answer itself demonstrated the argument. A decentralized system, indexed honestly, doesn’t erase by omission. It remembers by default. That contrast is the point. This is why I built Redacted Chat. Not to “prove” anything — but to let people interact with memory that hasn’t been curated away. Builders will get it. Lurkers are welcome. Someday someone will pull on this thread.

nostrairedactedsciencecensorshipscience

Redacted Science: "But...But..But.. Cortisol Would Show This!"

Cortisol showed up on my labs even after my adrenal glands were gone. This post explains how — and why it matters. From pituitary override to fungal hormonal mimicry, this is what the tests missed, and what the system never wanted you to see.

redactedsciencemedicalsuppressionEndocrineCollapseCortisolAdrenalFailureBiolhackingSurvivalBiologyEndocrineFailureFungalAdaptationOpenMedicineRedactedScience

Redacted Science -Periphereal Sacrifice

Nonfiction. Not metaphor. Not memory error. They tied off their limbs to keep blood flowing to the gut — because that’s where survival lived. I haven’t tied off anything. Not physically. But I’ve let go of plenty to preserve what’s left of the core. This isn’t forgotten history. It’s the present — right here, and right now.

nonfictionredactedscienceChatGPTOpenAImedicine