#

fiat

(49 articles)

Are Spot ETFs a threat to Bitcoin Long Term?

### What is a Bitcoin spot ETF? Is an asset that tracks the price of **Bitcoin**. ### Why is it considered a game changer? Institutional investors and wealthy individuals, using large investment firms like Blackrock, Fidelity or Ark among others, will be able to acquire the asset with low risk, since these investment firms are highly regulated. These investors have above 15 trillion dollars invested in these large firms and therefore, it is expected that these firms will allocate at least 1% of their portfolios to it. That will be mean a minimum of $150 billions into **Bitcoin**, which is remarkable considering the current market cap of the asset is currently $570 billion. An injection of minimum $150 billions translates in a huge demand for **Bitcoin** with massive potential for price appreciation. ### Current mayor players ### Until now, very few large institutions have acquired **Bitcoin**, examples are **Tesla Inc (Nasdaq: TSLA)** and **Microstrategy (Nasdaq: MSTR)**, which wrote a document labeled "A summary of some of the key considerations for corporations to keep in mind when investing in bitcoin". The link to the document: *https://www.microstrategy.com/en/bitcoin/documents/key-considerations-for-corporate-investment-in-bitcoin* ### Let's check the math ### *Amount of **Bitcoins** mined per day*: - Bitcoins mined per block: 6.25 - Time in minutes to mine one block (approx): 10 - Minutes in one day: 1440 - Blocks mined per day: 144 -> (1440 / 10 = 144) - Bitcoins mined per day: 900 -> ( 144 x 6.25 = 900) After the halving, since the **Bitcoins** mined per block will be reduced to 3.125, we will only have 450 mined per day. ****Bitcoins*** available for trading*: - Around 4 million across exchanges - 900 per day injected in the market ### Assumptions ### - Miners are selling all 900 freshly mined Bitcoins - Financial institutions will allocate at least 1% of their portfolio into **Bitcoin** Assuming Miners sell all 900 every day (which is worst case scenario), this means, that in order for the price of Bitcoin to keep the current price (around $29.4K as I write this article), $26.5 millions are needed in the market to buy those 900 fresh mined every day, $795 million per month, $9.54 billion per year. ### Projections in price appreciation ### *Bear in mind that the projection can't be linear since there are many additional variables to factor in, specially qualitative non quantifiable ones as potential financial crisis, absurd regulations, more ETF delays, governments corruption, wars, pandemics, etc...* In terms of price appreciation, a 15X is plausible, which would rocket the price of **Bitcoin** to around $441K as soon as the $150 billion are deployed to acquire it. Now, consider that this is worst case scenario and valid only until the end of this halving (the amount of mined **Bitcoin** per day will be reduced by half after it), next one is around the end of April 2024. ### What happens with the numbers after the Halving? ### After the halving, with the current amount of financial energy injected into **Bitcoin** ($26.5 million), the price would potentially double to around $58.8K, and if 1% of the investment companies applying for an ETF is injected, the math take the potential price of **Bitcoin** to $882K as soon as that 1% is deployed. ### Time frame for price appreciation? ### Unknown, but I would assume before the end of 2024, Why? Because the ETFs are being yet again delayed for Blackrock and Fidelity until December 2023 by the SEC (Security Exchange Commission) in USA. But USA is not the only country where large Investment Companies are applying for ETFs, it is true that the two largest ones are in USA, but there are many more that combined across the world would add up to a massive additional amount of capital injected into **Bitcoin**. ### The first ETF to go public will be in Europe ### **Jacobi Asset Management**, issuer of an equity structure for digital assets in Europe with the first Bitcoin ETF, with a total portfolio of approx. $4.8 billion. Assuming 1% (worst scenario) of its portfolio will be deployed into **Bitcoin**, additional $48 million would be injected. The launch of this ETF was "July 2023", I will assume this capital will be injected between August and December 2023. Professional investors can already let them know of their interest in their web site: https://jacobiam.com/jacobi-ft-wilshire-bitcoin-etf/ ### Long term impact? We can divide the long term impact into two arenas: - Asset appreciation - Attempts to control the asset #### Long terms asset appreciation #### As explained before, the more capital is deployed into the asset, and the more time passes, the more valuable and scarce it becomes (one halving every 4 years) and therefore, **Bitcoin** will continue to appreciate over time by "a lot". Extrapolate the financial institutions portfolio investment to 5% of 15 trillion dollars, then to 10% and so on. Considering that **Bitcoin** is the best asset in terms of appreciation of the last 10 years, it is plausible that institutional investors will be eager to put more than 1% of their portfolios into **Bitcoin**, I would assume that 5% for the most conservative and 20% for the most aggressive will be logical. You do the math, you will get numbers that will explain *why so many financial analyst come with such a high numbers in their predictions of the future price of **Bitcoin**.* #### Attempts to control the asset in the long term #### Recently I read a post from Chris Blec in X, his post was quite interesting, it reads *"Pfizer convinced billions of people to inject a mysterious chemical into their body multiple times but you don't think Blackrock can convince normies that their fork is the *real* Bitcoin?"* A provocative post which opens the door for debate, one that I am certain is being discussed for years already close doors among the **Bitcoin** community. ##### Potential Attack vectors #### - *Forking ***Bitcoin*** into POS*: Blackrock or a union of Investment corporations could influence with their resources some key developers and miners to fork Bitcoin into a PoS (Proof of Stake) chain, basically centralizing and controlling Bitcoin. A fork creates a new chain and the users will decide which chain is ***Bitcoin***, users decide by changing their Node into the new chain or not, *one Node, one Vote.* - *Forking ***Bitcoin*** to reduce the block time to 1 minute*: With the excuse to reduce the validation transaction time. This will imply many changes that will lead to mining 9000 per day instead of the 900 as of today, reducing the scarcity by increasing the offer and therefore reducing the price - *Forking ***Bitcoin*** to increase the block size*: This was attempted before, *Jonathan Bier* in his book *The Blocksize War: The battle over who controls Bitcoin’s protocol rules* does a decent job explaining the depths of the attack. But in summary leads to centralization of control of the network ##### Countermeasures ##### - *Education*: In my opinion, education is key, those investment funds manage money from wealthy investors, if those investors understand the ethos of Bitcoin and why the asset is so scarce and valuable, they will fight back together with the individual investors for those changes not to be pedaled into the chain. At the end, greed is a very strong motivator and Satoshi understood that perfectly and therefore it is accounted for in the design. - *Awareness*: A considerable percentage of the Bitcoin investors are well informed and therefore, fear can't be use as a trigger, as it was the case of the pharmaceuticals and their experimental drugs, the investment companies could use their resources to create campaigns pushing their narrative, but the community will see through that and counter it in the social networks quite fast, in my opinion, in the age of information, the legacy MSM (Main Stream Media) can't easily steer the **Bitcoin** ecosystem opinion as they could have done with the population up to the 90s, now is a real challenge for them. Proof of that is that they have been fighting Bitcoin with everything they got until now. They short it, talk trash it as much as they could in the legacy MSM, call it rat poison, stated that it will go to zero (while secretly buying it...) and after all that, now they are lining up to buy it and speaking highly of the asset. - *Run your own Node*: **Bitcoin** has endured 14 years of attacks and survived thanks to the community and investors, we need to stay vigilant and protect it, run at least one Node at home, remember, one Node, one Vote. *Can you think of additional **countermeasures**?* originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/226279

The Future of Fiat - Central Bank Digital Currencies

Download the full presentation [here](https://drive.proton.me/urls/RBETWE042M#WMkcWpIOtXV2 ) The problem - how do you adequately convey the consequences of a CBDC to someone with no interest in finance? Central Bank Digital Currencies are in active development all around the world. Central bankers and government officials are doing their best to champion the supposed merits of a digital national currency. But does anyone actually want a CBDC? If your local jurisdiction were to put a CBDC to a vote, the increased level of awareness and scrutiny would offset the prevailing information asymmetry between central planners and voters. It is unlikely that such a vote would pass. So it will never be put to a vote. Therefore, it is important to consider: * Why Central Bank Digital Currencies are being developed right now in 130 countries, representing 98% of global GDP. * Why they are a net-negative for society. ## What is a CBDC? Understand the fundamental characteristics of a Central Bank Digital Currency. https://m.primal.net/HcJC.png ## What does a CBDC enable? The programmable nature of a CBDC will allow capabilities that are not feasible in the current fiat financial system. https://m.primal.net/HcJE.png ## The "financial inclusion" myth "*Our regulatory system is actively excluding people from access to finance. We have finally reached the point where access to basic financial services has become a privilege*" - Andreas Antonopoulos It has been a consistent talking point among central planners that a CBDC will promote financial inclusion. But consider an era of accelerating fiat currency debasement combined with mandatory government identification, tighter lending conditions, increasingly arbitrary creditworthiness requirements and structurally higher interest rates. When you combine these elements, does it become easier or harder for the unbanked or the under-banked to access formal financial services? https://m.primal.net/HcJD.png ## The inner workings of a CBDC CBDC plumbing is constantly evolving, yet the objective remains the same - more control. https://m.primal.net/HcJF.png ## Is the current system already like a CBDC? It is true that the majority of fiat money is digital. What makes a CBDC unique is not that it is inherently digital, but rather how it can be packaged with other tools of the state. https://m.primal.net/HcJG.png ## The quiet part, out loud You don't need to take my word for it. Hear from the architects of our CBDC future. https://m.primal.net/HcJH.png ## How will a CBDC impact commercial banking Familiarise yourself the basics of commercial banking and how a CBDC alters the incentives of the incumbent system. https://m.primal.net/HcfE.png ## Cause for optimism On a long enough time horizon, some theorise that CBDCs will be unsuccessful. Between now and then you should expect a period of increased economic volatility and concerted attempts at narrative control. Stay informed and seek out self-sovereign alternatives where possible. Follow nation state CBDC progress and learn more with the Human Rights Foundation's [CBDC tracker](https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/). https://m.primal.net/HcJI.png Thank you for reading.

A não identificação do problema

[As pessoas estão a começar a sair à rua](https://observador.pt/2023/09/30/morte-aos-ricos-marteladas-na-montra-e-deputados-escoltados-a-manifestacao-pela-habitacao-em-imagens/), revoltadas com o custo de vida, a alta inflação e o alto custo das casas. A grande maioria das pessoas não tem ligação a um partido político em específico, mas os partidos políticos aproveitam a ingenuidade das populações para disseminar os seus ideais, em vez de ajudar as pessoas a identificar o problema, preferem divulgar soluções inócuas. ![](https://image.nostr.build/bc37acb867ab38a39d870f69f598f755207599a83e444859e9ba53d234089dbc.jpg) ![](https://image.nostr.build/f61502b71c620bdf270418133885ad850678e205f3192770968230df619e1cfb.jpg) ![](https://image.nostr.build/538649105a36616b78ece0e3dac8690c9b157ee3690d0405048863ac4dfceedc.jpg) ![](https://image.nostr.build/38d1e1d87e7967bd307054f5656d547439f67657bd580905de7e904967cf8e5b.jpg) O problema é que a maioria das pessoas só querem uma solução para o seu problema, mas não querem saber o que gera esse problema. Só entendendo a origem do problema, vão encontrar uma verdadeira solução. As pessoas de esquerda dizem que o problema é do capitalismo, os da direita dizem que é do socialismo. Como os mais velhos dizem: “**_Casa onde não há pão, todos ralham e ninguém tem razão_**“. O problema não é do capitalismo, dos ricos, mas sim do **sistema fiduciário**. As pessoas necessitam de **saber a verdade**. <br><br> A culpa é das moedas FIAT(euro, dólar), é um cancro(câncer) que contamina toda a economia. O sistema monetário que desvaloriza a moeda continuamente, obriga as pessoas a investir, os que sabem e os que não sabem, todos somos obrigados a investir senão perdemos dinheiro diariamente. Os principais afetados são os pobres, porque não sabem investir e tem pouco dinheiro para investir. Quem tem mais dinheiro, investe em ações, mas sobretudo no imobiliário.  Provocando um problema ainda maior no mercado imobiliário, uma enorme bolha. O **imobiliário não deveria ser um investimento**, é um bem de primeira necessidade, deveria ser acessível. O irônico desta manifestação, parte dos manifestantes pertencem ou são apoiantes de partidos que defendem políticas de desvalorização da moeda, ou seja, políticas que ainda agravam mais o problema do imobiliário. É claro que alguns sabem disso, mas a maioria não tem a mínima ideia. Por isso, o mais importante é informar as pessoas, para elas entenderem qual a origem do problema do imobiliário. Sem conhecerem o real problema, as pessoas acreditam que certas medidas que não resolvem nada, ou são apenas paliativos, ou então ainda agravam mais o problema. É como querer curar um cancro na cabeça com Aspirinas, alivia a dor momentaneamente, apenas adia o problema. A maior parte dos problemas graves que estão a acontecer no sistema financeiro, na verdade não são problemas, mas sim **sintomas**, o real problema é a moeda FIAT. A única solução é uma moeda com **oferta fixa**, hard money. <br><br> Inevitavelmente terá que existir uma revolução, **separar o poder monetário, do poder político**. Tão ou mais importante, como os nossos antepassados fizeram, ao separar religião e a política.